Find plus Sebesta 1994a: 51n14; Palmer 1989 : 41n177

153 The look of the students Roman Woman 37 Lucan dos.363–364: . umerisque haerentia primis / suppara nudatos cingunt angusta lacertos. (This new apparel is likely regarded on the plural here to possess explanations of scansion.) 38 To the strophium, pick Olson 2003: 203–5; Leary 1996: 198–9; Goldman 1994b: 233–5; cf. Richlin 1997, a fascinating account of one’s therapeutic spends of one’s lady people human anatomy, yet not a free account of Roman dresses or undies. 39 Ter. Eun. 313–317: haud similis virgost virginum nostrarum, quas matres student / demissis umeris esse, vincto pectore, ut gracilae sient. / au moment ou qua est habitior paulo, pugilem esse aiunt, deducunt cibum: / tam etsi bonast natura, reddunt curatura iunceam: / itaque ergo amantur. forty Discover Olson 2003: 204, with sources. 41 Prop. cuatro.–34: mox, ubi iam facibus cessit praetexta maritis, / vinxit et acceptas altera vitta comas . discussed by the Edmondson, chap. step one, in this regularity. 42 Val. Flac. 8.6: ultima virgineis tunc flens dedit oscula vittis. 43 Nonius 353 L = 236 M: minoris natu capite aperto erant, capillo pexo, vittis innexis crinibus. To get more detailed talk into vittae, come across Fantham, man. eight, in this frequency. 44 For the bulla, come across Gabelmann 1985: 520–1, 523; Goette 1986; Palmer 1989 . This may has kept ‘cures’ (remedia), earlier titled ‘provisions’ (praebia), but these should never be explicitly discussed: look for Macr. Seated. 1.6.9; Palmer 1989 : 20–21. Sons from freedmen and slaves was taboo to wear it (Palmer 1989 : fifteen, 69). Tarquinius Priscus is considered to possess already been the first ever to establish their guy having good bulla, as good token away from bravery, since the son had murdered an adversary in the competition whenever nevertheless from an age to put on the new bordered robe (Pliny HN ). Most bullae have been made out of silver (Festus 32 L = 36 Meters), however, Calpurnius Siculus (Ecl. six.41) talks regarding glass bullae (vitreas … bullas). Quaest. Rom 101 = Mor. 288a, stating that the newest bulla is donned by men even though their almost every other signs and symptoms of review was indeed left-off. forty-five Plaut. Epid. 639–640: non meministi myself auream advertisement te afferre natali perish lunulam atque anellum aureolum inside the digitum? 46 Isid. Etym. : lunulae sunt ornamenta mulierum inside the lunae similtudinem, bullulae aureae dependentes. Inside passageway mulierum will not indicate ‘women’s,’ but quite simply ‘female.’ Ulpian (due to the fact excerpted in the Break-down 34.dos.25.9) states: ‘a history regarding ladies attire includes infant clothes, females child’s dresses, and young girls’ gowns; for all of us of your ladies sex was classed as the women’ (muliebri veste legata mais aussi infantilem contineri ainsi que puellarum mais aussi virginum Pomponius libro vicesimo secundo post Sabinum recte scribit: mulieres enim omnes dici, quaecumque sexus feminini sunt). 47 Plaut. Rud. 1171: et bulla aurea est, pater quam dedit mi natali die. This is basically the

The newest locket, like the toga praetexta, signified the fresh child wasn’t to-be approached by the boys to own intimate purposes: look for Plut

There’s nothing on the artistic evidence to point that ladies wore the newest bulla. Given that Goette explains (1986: 144), you to definitely funerary save and therefore appears to show a female sporting which amulet toward nearer examination in fact portrays the girl within the a necklace carrying a spherical fruit to the woman tits (ibid. A potential Etruscan illustration of a lady in a beneficial bulla (ibid. Goette 1990: 80–dos, 158–9. Musei Capitolini, Rome, inv. About sculpture-classification, and this most likely as well as to begin with provided a portrayal of the dad, see George 2001. On south frieze, Brick observes perhaps not a good toga however, a good palla draped as the an effective toga (1994: 41 and you will n39; cf. George 2001: 189n25). To have identifications associated with contour, look for Gabelmann 1985: 522–3; George 2001: 184–5; Gercke 1968: 130; Kleiner 1993: 33 (where she too notices not a good toga however, good palla); Simon 1967: 19.