Response: So it potential research will be fascinating, needless to say, not for the lookup matter. In case the customer takes into account which our analyses aren’t suitable for address all of our search matter (not to most other possibly fascinating look questions), we wish to come across an obvious malfunction of them proposed analyses and you may a reason for them. Due to the fact the new customer have not warranted this point and has now only described what the guy/she would want to see or would have accomplished by themselves/by herself, here’s no need to do this. What it is of our manuscript are obvious; maybe not specifically committed, but obvious: evaluate pages and you can nonusers in mating orientations. The fresh new suggested research is not necessarily the that must make an effort to offer a means to fix the research concern.

Out-of an analytical attitude, it has been recognized for an eternity that dichotomizing variables is not a beneficial habit (Cohen, 1983).

Brand new SOI-R performed declaration differences between everyone (expected). But really regarding the exhibited regression (dining table 2) the outcomes is unexpected with the Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). How does? Why does which try the entire model?

Response: Once again, i have got problems to completely understand the comment. Thus, we really do not carry out one alter out-of this issue.

elizabeth.grams. 222-229: The newest conversation while the theory was dealing with this new aim away from profiles. Yet no aim are reviewed, but thinking. The link between each other is forgotten on the article, excite promote specific next books or specialize in thinking.

Response: We regret not to become agreed on this point. Given this performing situation, we learn whether or not you’ll find variations in mating orientations (short-term, long-term) depending on no matter if you’re a person regarding relationships applications. All of our means is based on prior browse performed with this material and you will, until the good the education, there is absolutely no option strategy off this dilemma that has presented is much better than today’s one. Ergo, we really do not create changes in the newest manuscript in respect which have to so it opinion.

Severe: The brand new reference out of solitary college students are shed ahead of (label or at least in the 1st 50 % of the new conceptual).

Right away of your own manuscript, i discuss the reasons for the usage dating applications and you can you to definitely, regardless of the present stereotype, they are utilised to possess a wide variety of grounds, not merely toward try to find everyday intercourse

Response: Thanks a lot considerably for this opinion. Adopting the their testimonial, we have integrated this problem in the 1st 1 / 2 of the fresh conceptual (p. dos, line twenty-eight): “Members was 902 solitary college students off a mid-size Spanish college or university…”. Apart from that, regarding the Participants and you may Processes area, i said: “This research is element of more substantial project done in an excellent Spanish school you to aimed to explore multiple aspects of new sexuality of younger college students” (today, during the p. 6, traces 142-143). Additionally, we told you “the writer?s school” (p. seven, line 170), and this issue is discussed inside the study’s constraints (now, into the p. fifteen, contours 336-340).

235: “Conclusions”. While the correlations try presented and hypothesis examined for the a mix-sectional analysis, this new wording would be chose much more considerate.

Response: We have meticulously searched that it section therefore we haven’t been able to find any causal allege. We have attempted to establish our very own performance since ‘differences’, ‘correlations’ otherwise ‘associations’. However if i missed one causal claim, we will change it.

Using relationship apps is evaluated rather than delving to the types of spends, away from individuals who tried it using one mid-day given that a great laugh among loved ones to people just who tried it for months searching to have a partnership

Response: Thank you for the recommendation. We now have integrated facts throughout the Limits point, to include all affairs stated from the reviewers (now when you look at the pp. 15-16, outlines 341-365):

The analysis has actually numerous limits. Other constraints was linked to the new representativeness of your try and you may this new generalization of results. One of several last professionals, the brand new shot are mainly female, old ranging from 18 and you can twenty-six, solitary and you can from school, making the performance difficult to generalize to all or any students and, nonetheless reduced in order to young non-university students.